Major league trading features: Ladbrokes, William Hill Premier League authority

Major league trading features: Ladbrokes, William Hill Premier League authority

General gaming company system: William Hill, Ladbrokes, Wade, Yishengbo, Interwetten (Cyprus), BET365, Oddset (Germany), SNAI (Italy), etc.



These companies make up the main odds system. For a certain item of winning or losing in most games, once these companies achieve a more consistent tendency, the probability of the result of this item will be very high, and the differences between them in the details of a certain item will often This is our opportunity to capture the unpopularity. At the same time, due to the different regions and customer groups, for different leagues, in addition to conforming to the mainstream thinking, they also have their own uniqueness and authority due to their own conditions and backgrounds. The specific nature of the competition is as follows:


Premier League: also includes the British Championship, League One, Scottish Premier League and other British series. The combination system of Ladbrokes, William Hill and Wade is more authoritative in this field. Since it is a local game in the UK, the differences between these three companies are not very big. Therefore, the combination of BET365 and Yishengbo, which are both British systems, and the comparison of these three companies also play a greater role in the Premier League and British series. For some more positive games, the tendency of 365 and Yishengbo to win, draw and lose tends to be closer to Ladbrokes or Wade in the final compensation stage, and once it is higher or has a big difference with Ladbrokes, you should pay attention to this result There may be problems with whether it can be realized, especially 365's final compensation attitude.


Bundesliga: Among the mainstream companies, William Hill, Ladbrokes, and Wade have a strong grasp of the Bundesliga, and the attitudes of William Hill and Ladbrokes are crucial to the trend of the Bundesliga. The basic feature is that William Hill is tied in the Bundesliga On the other hand, Ladbrokes is more conservative in terms of main wins. For example, Ladbrokes has strong support for the main victory, while William Hill is relatively low-key in terms of draws. At this time, the inclinations of British upstream companies such as Wade, 365, and Yishengbo are particularly important. In addition to these multinational companies, the comparison of the odds of some local German companies such as Oddset with mainstream companies is also of more reference value.


Serie A: For Serie A, the combination of William Hill + Ladbrokes + SNAI (Italy) is widely used in actual combat. Compared with mainstream Dazhuang, SNAI is more objective in reflecting away wins and draws. It should be noted that in some games that may be unpopular, SNAI often does a good job of baiting the main victory, fully showing Italian cunning. However, in competitions where other mainstream companies or most companies perform more positively, SNAI's winning attitude is worthy of attention. The specific performance is that with the support of mainstream attitudes and fundamentals, SNAI's main win value is always slightly lower than that of William Hill.


La Liga: For La Liga, the most popular saying nowadays is that Wade is the most authoritative, but judging from his performance in the past two seasons, Wade's odds thinking has become more and more mainstream, and he has not done much. The more traditional combination model, namely Ladbrokes and William, combined with Wade's entry analysis is more successful. The comparison between Nordicbet registered in Costa Rica and Interwetten in Cyprus and Dazhuang's attitude is also more effective.


Ligue 1: In Ligue 1, Ladbrokes' odds change less sometimes, so comparing the real-time average of 365 and Wade with Ladbrokes' static odds is currently the mode I use more, and its effect is still It is ideal. My experience is: the attitude in the initial compensation stage is more important, that is, the result of 365 in the initial stage is slightly lower than Ladbrokes or the odds value is close to Ladbrokes. If the value does not change much in the final compensation stage, the result of this item It may be larger. If there are obvious changes in the final compensation stage, it is necessary to refer to the attitudes of other companies, and use other means of settlement to observe and draw conclusions.


Nordic competitions: Nordic competitions include Norwegian Super League, Danish Super League, Swedish Super League, Icelandic Super League and Finnish Super League. These events also appear frequently in single games and lottery games in Beijing. For such events, it is more feasible to conduct a comparative analysis of the combination of Nordicbet + Ladbrokes and the combination of 365 + Wade. The general idea is: the positive attitude of the 365+Wade combination should be slightly lower than the odds value of the former combination, and the normal odds of Nordicbet should be lower than that of several other companies, so the probability of this item is higher. In terms of draws or away wins in Nordic events, the comparison of Wade + 365 is more important. The general idea is: 365 should be optimistic about an odds value that is lower than Wade, and Wade should not have a greater relationship with Ladbrokes in this item. difference.


Japan and South Korea leagues: Wade + 365 + Yishengbo combination is more practical, while the standard odds of Asian Aocai, SB (Sabah), Mingsheng and several European companies in the peak or on-the-spot stage are also good. more important. The general idea is: the opening time of Asian companies for Asian games is slightly earlier than that of Wade and other companies. Among the three adjusted odds of Asian companies in the standard market during the peak period of betting, the one that is closer to Wade and others is worthy of attention. However, this method is slightly less effective in the application of standard odds than in Asian handicap. Another method is the comparative analysis of AOC and William Hill. The idea is: AOC mainly refers to William Hill in competitions outside Asia, and when returning to its own territory, AOC will appear Some major adjustments. For example, in Japanese events, Aocai’s standard odds are set later than William Hill’s, and if a certain odds value is lower than William Hill’s, it is not a big problem to play in this direction. For another example, if the William Hill odds are adjusted for a certain instant odds of an Asian game, if the odds are raised, it will be difficult to play if the expected value of the item is higher. When the expected value of this item is low, the odds will be raised by Macau, and the possibility of this item will increase instead.


Brazil Group A: Costa Rica's Nordicbet has a strong grasp of American events, and they have a wide range of cross-referencing applications with Wade and Yishengbo. Among the mainstream companies, Yishengbo and BET365 are more sensitive to the opening of American games. If the odds of a cross between Nordicbet and 365 are lower than Wade or Yishengbo, the probability of this item cannot be ignored.


The above is just a summary of each company’s ability to grasp different leagues. What I want to emphasize here is that making a game conclusion is a three-dimensional project. Simply relying on odds or using a single method is not the best way to improve the betting hit rate. The best choice, this book advocates the combined analysis of European odds and ya and penetrates into a comprehensive analysis of handicap odds mechanism, so as to achieve the most ideal betting. Therefore, this part can only be mastered as a part of the game analysis process, please pay attention.